Monday, March 18, 2019
Cloning Essay -- essays research papers fc
With the technological noesis in the cosmos increment from day to day, there is no way to predict where science whitethorn lead us in the future. Just a few historic period ago, clone was something of a fictional nature that most scientists had thought or so, solely nalways ill considered it as an experiment. Recently, animals have been ringerd, and cloning has become no less than square(a) reality. In a few more years, the comeledge on how to clon mans could be present. Before that advancement arrives, we motif to ask ourselves if this noesis of cloning is a beneficial idea or a baneful one. Cloning will have negative personal effects on our decree in the future because cloning de levers uniqueness of the person cloned, clones could be utilise in crimes or used as weapons, cloned animals that ar reintroduced into the ecosystem could cause the ecosystem to agitate drastically, people who try to clone their dead love ones will be shocked to find that the clone may gibe the person that they love, yet it really isnt the person that they love, finally, animals that are cloned for medical reasons dont merit to be brought into this world just to be used only for their organs and other remains parts. If something isnt done to avoid cloning humans forward it is too late, thus cloning could upset the balance of our society drastically, by chance causing permanent mishap in the world as we kat once it today. The association on how to clone humans doesnt exist yet, further the knowledge on how to clone animals is presently being utilized in enquiry labs worldwide. Standard cloning involves taking DNA (deoxyribonucleic acid) from a electric cell of a particular species and transferring it into an clump cell from other animal belonging to the resembling species or another one. Before this process can take place, the burden from the original cell must be removed from that egg. The result is wherefore implanted into the replacement mother. This mother will then provide the fodder and nutrients for the embryo to climb up until the mother gives tolerate to the clone. Until recently, the surrogate mother had to be of the same species, but now, with recent technological advances, one species can now give birth to a different species (" learning and Technology" 100). The wash list of complaints about cloning begins with the fact that cloning humans decreases the value of uniqueness of the individual. Accordi... ...ls." CeresNet 2000.5 Nov. 2000 http//www.ceresnet.org/ViewEntry.cfm?ID=82&Section=outreach Colvin, Jonathon. "Me, my clone, and I (or in justification of human cloning)." The do-gooder May/Jun. 2000 39. Dixon, Dr. Patrick. Dont Clone 3 Reasons. 31 Oct. 2000 http//www.globalchange.com/noclones.htm Lemonick, Michael D. "Could a clone ever run for President?" Time 8 Nov. 1999 96. Mayor, Susan. "UK regimen recommend human cloning for therapeutic research." British Medic al diary 98 1613. Myers, Nichole. private Interview. 1 April. 2001. Pavone, Fr. Frank. "What does it mean to be Me?" 31 Oct. 2000 http//www.priestsforlife.org/pressreleases/clonepress.html Rembert, Tracey C. "Me and my shadow." E Jul/Aug. 1997 1521. Schaeffer, Pamela. " numerous oppose human cloning." National Catholic reporter 22 Oct. 1999 19,21. "Science and technology New kid on the block." The economist 14 Oct. 2000 100. "Vatican No to human cloning." National Catholic Reporter 22 Oct. 1999 21. Watson, Rory. "European parliament wants world ban on human cloning." British Medical diary 97 847 Cloning Essay -- essays research written document fc With the technological knowledge in the world growing from day to day, there is no way to predict where science may lead us in the future. Just a few years ago, cloning was something of a fictional nature that most scientists had thought about, but never seriously consid ered it as an experiment. Recently, animals have been cloned, and cloning has become no less than true reality. In a few more years, the knowledge on how to clone humans could be present. Before that advancement arrives, we need to ask ourselves if this knowledge of cloning is a beneficial idea or a destructive one. Cloning will have negative effects on our society in the future because cloning devalues uniqueness of the individual cloned, clones could be used in crimes or used as weapons, cloned animals that are reintroduced into the ecosystem could cause the ecosystem to change drastically, people who try to clone their dead loved ones will be shocked to find that the clone may resemble the person that they love, but it really isnt the person that they love, finally, animals that are cloned for medical reasons dont deserve to be brought into this world just to be used only for their organs and other body parts. If something isnt done to avoid cloning humans before it is too late, then cloning could upset the balance of our society drastically, possibly causing irreversible mishap in the world as we know it today. The knowledge on how to clone humans doesnt exist yet, but the knowledge on how to clone animals is presently being utilized in research labs worldwide. Standard cloning involves taking DNA (deoxyribonucleic acid) from a cell of a particular species and transferring it into an egg cell from another animal belonging to the same species or another one. Before this process can take place, the nucleus from the original cell must be removed from that egg. The result is then implanted into the surrogate mother. This mother will then provide the food and nutrients for the embryo to develop until the mother gives birth to the clone. Until recently, the surrogate mother had to be of the same species, but now, with recent technological advances, one species can now give birth to a different species ("Science and Technology" 100). The laundry list of c omplaints about cloning begins with the fact that cloning humans decreases the value of uniqueness of the individual. Accordi... ...ls." CeresNet 2000.5 Nov. 2000 http//www.ceresnet.org/ViewEntry.cfm?ID=82&Section=outreach Colvin, Jonathon. "Me, my clone, and I (or in defense of human cloning)." The Humanist May/Jun. 2000 39. Dixon, Dr. Patrick. Dont Clone 3 Reasons. 31 Oct. 2000 http//www.globalchange.com/noclones.htm Lemonick, Michael D. "Could a clone ever run for President?" Time 8 Nov. 1999 96. Mayor, Susan. "UK authorities recommend human cloning for therapeutic research." British Medical Journal 98 1613. Myers, Nichole. Personal Interview. 1 April. 2001. Pavone, Fr. Frank. "What does it mean to be Me?" 31 Oct. 2000 http//www.priestsforlife.org/pressreleases/clonepress.html Rembert, Tracey C. "Me and my shadow." E Jul/Aug. 1997 1521. Schaeffer, Pamela. "Many oppose human cloning." National Catholic Reporter 22 Oct. 1999 19,21. "Science and technology New kid on the block." The Economist 14 Oct. 2000 100. "Vatican No to human cloning." National Catholic Reporter 22 Oct. 1999 21. Watson, Rory. "European parliament wants world ban on human cloning." British Medical Journal 97 847
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment