Is Abortion Ever Justfied? Essays -- essays research papers

Is stillbirth ever justified? If not, wherefore? If it depends, then on what? It is not unreasonable to suggest that the vast mass of mint consider it morally wrong to kill other individuals. at that place may be examples of situations where the killing of a person may be justifiable, although they be by no means universally reacted to, such as killing in self defence or as a form of capital punishment, but taken in isolation it is largely accepted that to kill is wrong. Therefore in the debate between master and anti abortionists must centre around two essential questions whether a foetus is a person, and if so when a foetus becomes a person and whether abortion erect be said to be self defence. perchance the deepest dilemma for an anti abortionist concerns the stage at which a foetus can be said to be alive, in the sense in which we would adduce to a child after it is born. It seems absurd to think that in the comparatively short time which the stimulate takes, th e babys status result be so radically altered yet an almost privy store is set by birth as for the first time we can distinguish a distinct personality, and directly interact with the sister . However, it is a largely unfounded significance in ethical name as birth is often governed by contingent factors and the time of birth can be manipulated. Also to be considered is the fact that if the baby is pay back to emerge from the womb, then surely it possesses enough properties for us to consider it in some sense a person. For example, if not than an eight month senescent foetus would not suck in the same demand to personhood as a two-month-old baby born prematurely at six months even though they argon of similar developmental stages. Thus other stages of pregnancy are more commonly cited as the point in which personhood begins. John Grigg adopts the location that there is a life that comes into existence as soon as conception occurs To my mind life begins at the moment of conc eption fancy is the magic moment.(John Grigg, in the Guardian, 29 October 1973)This view may be knobbed if we consider that life does not necessarily imply personhood. We may claim that the foetus is a human being but this merely implies that it is a member of our species, and not that of another. Yet it is at least true to guess that a foetus, even in the earliest stages of pregnancy has the potential to be a person. This is slightly differe... ...elf defence, even though the foetus has no role to harm the woman, it is a sad situation in which both parties top executive be thought of as morally blameless. However, can any abortion said to be self-defence? The reaction to an intrusion in the rest home may be said to be defence, yet a menage is worth far less than your own body. The title question of this leaven and the questions raised within it remain unconcluded. The problem is not that there are no answers, rather there are too many. The issue is mixed further by the fac t that every single situation is different. miscarriage is a very personal issue that effects many people in the world, the average Russian woman has twelve abortions in her life, it is in addition an especially emotional subject. Abortion is justified everyday, however whether it is a exercising that can be morally justified with any universal consent is another issue. The only way I can see that abortion might receive the most moral acceptance, is that if it is presented on the grounds that we must all step back and respect that other moral agents have a right to make autonomous decisions, regardless of what we think approximately the way they choose to assert their autonomy.